Chris and John hold a hug-a-thon

Chris Wallace's interview with John Brennan on Sunday raises many questions. Why did Chris choose to interview an NBC and MSNBC "analyst?" Why now? Why did Chris let the former CIA director get away with outright lies? He's certainly not afraid to confront people, such as when he interrupted Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar mid-interview on Sunday to remind him that Joe Biden is in fact the president-elect: “He’s the president-elect, sir. The president-elect.” Chris has come out of the liberal closet, and it's fun to watch his colleagues veering to the left now that the Murdochs are going that way. Well, you don't want to give up those hefty salaries. Chris, as an example, makes a cool $7 mil a year. He's just one of us. So is Bret Baier, who also pulls in $7 mil. Neither comes close to Sean Hannity at $40 million. Why did John say he didn't mind John Durham carrying out his investigation? Durham interviewed Brennan, and rightly so: Brennan is at the center of the attempted coup d'etat against the President. Perhaps it was just Brennan's customary bluster. Perhaps he realizes that John Durham isn't actually going to do anything. Neither, of course, is Bill Barr. Remember when Barr said back in July that he won’t wait until after election to reveal Durham’s findings? That was awesome. Of course Barr just recently made Durham a "special counsel." On its face this suggests that it will be harder for a President Biden to get rid of him; in reality it means nothing. Does it, however, signal Barr's belief that Biden will in fact be President? Some have suggested that Barr did it to make it harder for Trump to declassify documents that are within Durham's purview. That was the tactic Rod Rosenstein employed whe Mueller was on the prowl. Perhaps Brennan was encouraged by the rumor circulating in the leftist press that Barr might resign early. At this point, in terms of the President and the coup, an early resignation wouldn't make much difference.

~ Anemious